Log in

The Anal Fisters [entries|friends|calendar]
Liberating America One Charred Building at a Time

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

(1 shit covered fist | fist my anus!)

Mass Critical Mass arrests [29 Aug 2004|12:20pm]

After taking some pictures of Critical Mass riders getting arrested, I turned to walk away and suddenly was in cuffs, one of the 264 cyclists and random passers-by arrested Friday night. Rather than writing us summonses for the offenses we were charged with, which were violations (on par with a traffic ticket or an open container), not even misdemeanors, the cops decided to teach us a lesson by hauling us over to a bus depot-turned-holding cell where we got to sleep in cages on diesel-sludge-covered concrete. (Many people reported chemical burns from contact with the floor.) I got to spend 16 hours there, then ride a corrections bus downtown to Central Booking for the full handcuff/search/mugshot/prints treatment, in shackles all the way, and spent another 14 hours there while the cops, who were either intentionally stalling on Bloomberg's orders or staggeringly incompetent, took 14 more hours to write us all the same desk-appearance tickets they could have given out at the scene. There were still at least 50 people in there when I got out at 2:30 a.m. Monday (and spent another hour waiting on line to get my keys, phone, camera, and pen from the property clerk).


(2 shit covered fists | fist my anus!)

haha [02 Aug 2004|09:27pm]

"George Bush and I do not agree on a lot of issues," Kelly said in a statement. "But in turbulent times, what the American people need more than anything is continuity of government, even with some imperfect policies."

--Randy Kelly, mayor of St. Paul and a supposed Democrat who is supporting Bush's reelection

(4 shit covered fists | fist my anus!)

[04 Jun 2004|12:41am]
[ mood | sexxxy ]

The Evasion kid is going "on tour". He's including Bismarck too, so streetlightpoet is hooking up a venue. Small town tour, I guess. I'm still not quite sure how I feel about him, but it should be interesting anyway.

(fist my anus!)

scammin! [01 Jun 2004|01:22am]

[ mood | accomplished ]

cat forgot her wallet at home, and we were stranded in downtown chicago. ...kind of... luckily, we had our scammin survival skills that we learned in radical girl scouts. so after much struggle on cat's behalf at whole foods, we finally got some food and 6 dollars in cash! hurray for cat's persistence, and a nice cashier. (but hurray for maria's coachin! yeessss!) she also got a 10 dollar store credit at bed bath and beyond, where the first scam was attempted.

hurray for random encounters with qute anarkissed boizzz!!!111!


(6 shit covered fists | fist my anus!)

hahahaha [19 Apr 2004|04:36pm]
[ mood | amused ]

    A U.S. Forestry Service official reported a company vehicle had been vandalized this week.
    Spokesman Tim Swedberg said someone spray-painted a portrait of University President Bob Bruininks and the name "Bruininks" on the hood of the vehicle.
    "This was probably just a springtime thing," Swedberg said. "This was not high-quality art; a little paint thinner took care of it."

From the Daily, just today.

(2 shit covered fists | fist my anus!)

this is where our drinks come from! [31 Mar 2004|09:17pm]

Protesting a mass firing of union leaders, 30 Coca-Cola workers in Colombia began a hunger strike March 15, which was met by death threats from paramilitaries known to have worked on the company’s behalf in the past.

A group of 91 workers—nearly three-fourths union leaders—was dismissed in February after Coca-Cola closed several plants. Protesters say the company targets union shops, and the hunger strikers in eight Colombian cities demand reinstatement of the fired workers.

A group affiliated with the country’s most notorious paramilitaries, the AUC, released a statement declaring war on the union leaders and promising to “finish them all off” if they do not leave the country in three months.

Paramilitaries acting with at least tacit approval of Colombian Coca-Cola officials are suspected in the murder of seven Coca-Cola unionists in recent years and the kidnapping and torture of others. About 3,600 Colombian union members have been killed in the last two decades, most at the hands of right-wing paramilitaries.

Daily updates from the hunger strikers detail threatening phone calls, police harassment, government indifference and company disciplinary hearings for strikers.

SINALTRAINAL, the Colombian Coca-Cola union, says 500 workers have been forced into retirement since September by consolidation, and when 91 workers refused the lump-sum buyout, they were fired. The workers’ collective bargaining agreement says they should be transferred, and even though a Colombian judge in January upheld that principle, the country’s labor ministry ruled against the workers.

“The ministry gives mixed results depending upon who is in power,” says Daniel Kovalik, counsel for the plaintiffs in a lawsuit against Coca-Cola filed in a Florida court on behalf of tortured and murdered union members. “Certainly, under the current [Colombian President Alvaro] Uribe administration, it is antagonistic toward the workers.”

Coca-Cola called the hunger strike “unfortunate,” saying it treated all employees fairly.

Anti-sweatshop student groups are pressuring their administrations to request an investigation of the violence against Coca-Cola workers. One school—DePaul University in Chicago—has asked the Worker Rights Consortium, which monitors compliance with the codes of conduct that corporations sign with colleges, to step in.

Acting at the behest of its affiliate schools, the WRC has investigated apparel factories worldwide. An agency official said examining Coca-Cola would be a natural extension of the group’s scope because some member schools have licensing contracts with the company.

“We see this as the same issue, just in a different industry,” says Jon Rodney, a University of California-Berkeley anti-sweatshop activist. “The university’s logo and image is tainted by this kind of exploitation and violence.”

(fist my anus!)

Am I the lucky one, or what? [25 Mar 2004|10:43pm]

[ mood | Peeping Tom ]

Today I casually looked out the window. Lo and behold, there stood before me - SEX.

I had to make it official of course.

And yes, my friends, my eyes did not deceive me. It was a couple having sex on 3rd floor.

This is not the first time this has happened. No.. this is the second time I have witnessed a couple have sex.
Unfortunately, I have never seen one finish.

(2 shit covered fists | fist my anus!)

stencils=fun [23 Mar 2004|10:36pm]

[ mood | listless ]

so i like this stenciling thing. i designed some. nothing original, but i like the pictures. let me know what you think!



see the resemblance???

if the pics aren't working, go here: http://www.villagephotos.com/pubbrowse.asp?selected=828271

(fist my anus!)

25 Ways to Supress Truth [22 Mar 2004|06:55pm]

[ mood | oi ]

Lifted from the amazing pages of http://www.totse.com

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the "How dare you!" gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such "arguable rumors". If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a "wild rumor" which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough "jargon" and "minutiae" to illustrate you are "one who knows", and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the "high road" and "confess" with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, "just isn't so." Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for "coming clean" and "owning up" to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can "argue" with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how "sensitive they are to criticism".

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.

(fist my anus!)

Get some free stuff!!! [19 Mar 2004|12:23pm]

Hey Everyone!! My mom just told me about this really cool site called Freecycle. You HAVE to check it out. It's everything ebay and capitalism is not. I love it.


It's basically like an online garage sale free box. Everything is free! I suggest you all go trade out some old stuff.. and get some new stuff!

(fist my anus!)

i love this [14 Mar 2004|03:25pm]

The Bush-Cheney presidential campaign disabled features of a tool on its website Thursday that pranksters were using to mock the Republican presidential ticket.

The tool originally let users generate a full-size campaign poster in PDF format, customized with a short slogan of their choice. But Bush critics began using the site to place their own snarky political messages above a Bush-Cheney '04 logo and a disclaimer stating that the poster was paid for by Bush-Cheney '04, Inc.

The campaign changed the tool Thursday so that users could no longer enter their own messages, but only select from a pull-down list of states and coalition groups. The campaign didn't respond to requests for comment.

The poster tool has been up and running since December, but Ana Marie Cox, editor of the Washington political gossip blog Wonkette, turned it into a weapon of mass satire this week when she devoted several posts to the inner workings of the device she dubbed the "Sloganator."

At Cox's request, close to 200 Wonkette readers sent in slogans which they had slipped through the system. Among them: "Run for your lives," "They sure smell like old people," and the Orwellian, "A boot stomping on a human face forever."

Cox also published lists of words the tool was allowing and, perhaps more tellingly, those it was not. Not surprisingly, it rejected the usual four-letter words and sexual lingo, but it also banned more innocuous terms like "stupid," "evil," "terrorists" and "Iraq."

Chuck DeFeo, the electronic campaign manager for the Bush-Cheney campaign, declined to say how the campaign was filtering user input. "We are taking significant precautions to prevent the use of offensive materials on the GeorgeWBush.com website," he said.

But despite the campaign's efforts, several Wonkette readers reported that the generator was occasionally routing slogans to the wrong users. One reported entering a sexually outrageous slogan and getting back a poster reading "Sportsmen for Bush-Cheney 2004," raising the possibility that somewhere in America a bewildered GOP duck hunter was wondering what on earth was going on with his party.

DeFeo said he was not aware that any slogans were being misrouted, but said that the more obscene slogans were indicative of a certain tone in the discourse of some Bush-Cheney opponents.

"Their action says a lot about people who are 100 percent committed to using profane and vulgar language in place of substantive dialog on the important issues facing America today," he said.

Cox scoffed. "No one's going to have a substantive dialog of any kind on a poster," she said. Besides, she argued, many of the humorous slogans were more thoughtful than anything the tool was designed to create.

She cited her own slogan, which she admitted was one of her favorites: "But not if you're gay!"

"'But not if you're gay!' has more intellectual weight behind it and says more about the Bush campaign than 'Ohioans for Bush' or 'Hunters for Bush,'" she said.

Cox, who counts herself neither a Bush nor a Kerry supporter, admitted that it would be a trivial matter to mock up the same posters in Photoshop. The attraction, she said, was somewhat childish.

"If someone made up a bunch of posters and did them on Photoshop no one would care. It's the juvenile glee of having the campaign be the ones to do it," she said. "But just because it's juvenile doesn't mean it's wrong and doesn't mean that it's not an expression of some kind of legitimate political grievance and opinion."

She read from a recent submission: "'Five hundred dead soldiers support Bush-Cheney '04.' See? Substantive political debate. That is an incredibly powerful political message. It may not be a discussion, but posters rarely are."

bush poster subverted!click me!

(fist my anus!)

no to all forms of terrorism [13 Mar 2004|10:39am]

The horrific bomb attacks in Spain are inexcusable. Targeting ordinary people is the work of evil people and no cause can justify it.

However, the rank hypocrisy of the politicians and governments who supported the war in Iraq condemning the attacks should be noted. For example, the Europe minister, Denis MacShane, stated that "no progress in human affairs will ever be built on the blood of innocent people." Someone should tell his leader Blair that. Blair obviously considers the ten thousand plus innocent Iraqis killed by his and Bush's invasion and occupation of their country as a price worth paying to make "progress."

MacShane correctly argued that "those who find ways of justifying terrorism, who can talk of understanding the motives of terrorist actions need to think hard and think differently." The defenders and practitioners of state terrorism (and war is terrorism) should ponder those words as well. Blair, after all, did exactly that the week before, justifying his actions and asking us to "understand" why he did it.

Thus the morality of the state comes into play. Legal violence is good, non-state approved violence is wrong. So when the state sheds the blood of innocent people to further its ends then it is considered normal, even praiseworthy. When others do so then they are evil beyond belief. In reality, it matters little to the victim whether they were murdered by the state or the terrorist. And in terms of common humanity, we should condemn both state and non-state terrorism in all their forms. We must condemn this atrocity as well as the atrocity of war.

It seems that, at the time of writing, ETA, the Basque Nationalist group, is at the top of the list for being blamed for the atrocity (Islamic terrorists being a close second). While it is obviously too early is know whether they are or not, this has not stopped Spanish politicians claiming within hours (and without evidence) it is ETA. No one has (so far) claimed responsibility. ETA, obviously, cannot be ruled out although this atrocity is substantially different from their usual activity. The leader of the banned pro-ETA Basque separatist party, Batasuna, denied that ETA could have been behind the attacks. One thing is sure, we can expect this evil act to be used to justify increased state repression and authoritarianism across Europe. In Spain, we can expect it to be used to justify more repressions of radicals, regardless of their links with ETA or Basque Nationalism.

So while numerous politicians have called this an attack on European democracy, the sad fact is that these very same politicians will now enact laws which undermine the very freedoms and democracy they claim to defend. The Spanish state has, after all, been at the forefront in trying to get the EU to toughen its "anti-terrorist" policies. This act will bolster such policies and we must condemn not only the attack about also attempts by politicians, bureaucrats and police to utilise it for their own ends.

The Madrid atrocity may have been done by ETA However, given that the Spanish Prime Minister, in the face of overwhelming public opposition, strongly supported the US-led war in Iraq, his actions could have exposed Spaniards to attack by Islamic extremist groups. If so, then yet again ordinary people are paying the price of their politicians' egos. It also makes a mockery of the claim that invading Iraq reduced rather than increased the threat of Islamic terrorism.

Ultimately, the only way to combat terrorism (both state and non-state) is to tackle its roots in an unjust system based on power and profit. While doing that, while opposing terrorism in all its forms, we must also not allow politicians and the state to use the deaths to destroy yet more of our liberties and rights.

(1 shit covered fist | fist my anus!)

[12 Mar 2004|04:50pm]

Just in case you didn't already hate dumbass people yet today.

(2 shit covered fists | fist my anus!)

Finally [09 Mar 2004|01:35pm]

[ mood | filthy ]


May co-sponsored the dining service resolution and said the University should look to other Big Ten schools as a guide for a new dining program.
The resolution condemns mandatory meal plans for residents and calls for a system that allows students to pay only for what they eat.
The current contract with Aramark Corporation is unacceptable and the University should exercise its right to opt out of the contract, May said.

(fist my anus!)

more fucked-up shit [08 Mar 2004|02:11pm]

[ mood | aggravated ]



First of all, we thank you all for your solidarity, messages of support, and assistance throughout the past several days. With the unprovoked attack on our space, law enforcement has proven that it is engaged in a campaign to terrorize communities of color—particularly those revolutionary activists, organizers and cultural workers that seek to create spaces of resistance and rebellion. If we are not safe in our homes, in our neighborhoods, at our parties, then where are we safe?

In the early morning hours of November 16, 2003, the NYPD engaged in an attack on a benefit party hosted at the Critical Resistance space in Brooklyn, New York for the 1st Anarchist People of Color (APOC) conference.

Approximately 20 marked police cruisers arrived around 2am in response to an officer’s report of someone standing outside the party allegedly holding an “open container.” Throngs of police indiscriminately sprayed chemical agents, beat people with nightsticks, punched, shoved, kicked and dragged people along sidewalks.

Police refused to produce proper identification. At least one camera used to record the incident was confiscated and/or destroyed. People suffered various injuries, from transgender harassment to blunt trauma, lacerations, contusions and lower back spasms. One person was treated for a hematoma on his right frontal skull.

Eight people were arrested on charges including inciting a riot, obstruction of governmental administration, resisting arrest, and disorderly conduct. All 8 were released on their own recognizance during the early morning hours of November 17. Arrestees were given a return court date of December 18, 2003.

Currently there are several ways to get involved:

* Arrange for activists to be interviewed by radio, TV, and print media. Please contact appropriate point people at 718.398.2825.

* Volunteer or join one of the organizing work groups. For more info call, 718.398.2825.

* Check website for updates http://www.criticalresistance.org/crnyc

* Support our work by making a financial contribution. (Make checks payable to “Brecht Forum” and write “Critical Resistance NYC” in the memo line.)

Critical Resistance-NYC is part of a national grassroots group that focuses on prisons and police brutality and challenges the belief that policing, surveillance, imprisonment, and similar forms of control make our communities safer.

(6 shit covered fists | fist my anus!)

My upcoming stencil [02 Mar 2004|11:32pm]

Just threw it together in Photoshop. Kinda rough in this stage, but you get the idea...

What do you think?

(fist my anus!)

this is too funny [02 Mar 2004|06:57pm]

[ mood | curious ]


The Goal: Destroying your Ballot
When you receive your ballot from the poll-clerk, be careful. Hold the ballot gingerly between two fingers. If it moves, drop it immediately and step on it. If its stench bothers you, plug your nose. Examine the ballot. If you feel overwhelmed by the vast array of choices, then you are not at a polling station, you are in a supermarket. If the prospect of voting in this bogus democracy is repulsive, ask for another ballot. You are entitled to it under the Canada Elections Act. Is the second ballot better? If it is, you are either on medication or the poll clerk is playing a joke on you. If it isn't, you have no option but to put the thing out of its misery.

There are many ways to destroy a ballot. You can choose one of many options. As with voting, it doesn't matter what you choose, the end result is the same -- your ballot gets destroyed. The choice is superficial, but you may as well choose a method which best suits your style and wardrobe.

Here are some suggestions:

1) Rip it
2) Burn it
3) Use it as toilet paper
4) Roll it into a huge joint and smoke it
5) Eat it
6) Fold it into a crane
7) Fold it into a paper airplane and fly it out the window
8) Shove it up your nose
9) Dissolve it in acid
10) Make confetti out of it
11) Fold it into a dish (use it for peanuts, soy nuts, or as an ashtray)

Our favorite method: EATING YOUR BALLOT

The trick to cooking with ballots is to use lots of strong spices. This will mask the bitter taste of big business and money. As always when handling ballots, make sure to wash your hands thoroughly with soap and hot water. If you are concerned about coming into contact with the germs of corporate power, you might want to wear latex gloves.

Note: The Surgeon General warns that ballots are toxic and can be hazardous to your health. Eating one every four years probably won't kill you, but putting one in the ballot box probably will.


hahaha. i looked up local election laws, and desroying ballots is a felony. i'm not sure if they mean destroying your own ballot, or other people's, tho. but it would be kind of ironic, because then i wouldn't legally be allowed to vote.... it also says that if you "spoil" your ballot, you can ask for another. that's a weird way to put it.

(fist my anus!)

Well, duh [02 Mar 2004|12:02pm]

[ mood | incestuous ]

Coca-Cola finally admitted earlier that Dassani is nothing more than filtered water taken from municipal water supplies. Haven't you fuckers tried drinking that shit? They gave it out at my old high school every now and then. It tastes like skank. No shit it's just filtered water, it's mother-fucking Coca-Cola.

(fist my anus!)

Update [28 Feb 2004|02:10pm]

Here's an article following up on Morgan Spurlock, the director who tried the "McDonald's Only" diet a while back:


(2 shit covered fists | fist my anus!)

[27 Feb 2004|01:14pm]

[ mood | feelin' black ]


"University police issued a campus safety alert Feb. 20 after nine thefts were reported on the St. Paul campus... Police have a white man in custody and are still looking for a 25- to 30-year-old black man about 6 feet tall with a medium build in connection with the St. Paul thefts. According to the crime alert, the suspects entered unlocked offices and labs and stole items such as laptops, purses and wallets."

[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]